Armijo v. Pettit

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

A statement of the essential facts has been heretofore made. Armijo v. Pettit, 34 N. M. 43, 277 P. 21, where we denied a motion to dismiss the appeal. Since then the original appellant has died, and the appeal has been revived in the name of Nicolas T. Armijo, her executor.

On the merits, appellant discusses two questions:

“1. Was the question of a deficiency judgment in personam previously adjudicated against the plaintiff, and

“2. Did the court err in refusing to grant the plaintiff’s third motion?”

She contends that the adverse ruling on her first motion is not…