Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Quesenberry

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1963No. 7336PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

The State Highway Commission (respondent-appellant) has appealed from a permanent writ of mandamus requiring it to pay relators (appellees) the amount awarded by a stipulated judgment in eminent domain, as compensation for the taking, for a public purpose, of certain real estate in Dona Ana County, New Mexico. The judgment in the condemnation proceeding was not appealed from and time for appeal therefrom has long since expired. Appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that mandamus, invoked in this case only in the nature of a writ of execution to enforce a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Jencks v. GoforthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Jordan v. JordanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Miller v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Cooper v. BrownfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rainaldi v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Brantley Farms v. Carlsbad Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Concerned Residents for Neighborhood Inc. v. ShollenbargerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. In Re NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API