Legal Opinion

Floersheim v. Board of Commissioners

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1922No. 2810PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PARKER, C. J.

One Manuel Martinez being a resident and taxpayer of Harding county, on behalf of himself and all other residents and taxpayers similarly situated, brought suit in the district court to enjoin the board of county commissioners of that county from issuing courthouse and jail bonds under the provisions of section 18 of chapter 48, Laws 1921, which was the act establishing Harding county. Various objections to the proposed action of the board of county commissioners were urged, and among them the following: (a) That said section was in violation of section 10 of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Harmon v. Auditor of Public AccountsIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  2. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Carroll v. BuntNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API