Legal Opinion
Speckner v. Riebold
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1974No. 9729PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
Upon consideration of the motion for rehearing, the opinion heretofore filed is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor:
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
The appellees Speckners brought this civil suit in the District Court of Grant County to foreclose an equitable mortgage. Appellee Charles Wilson (Wilson) and Farmers Market and Supply Company, Inc., (Farmers), holders of judgment liens against the appellants which were junior to the lien of the Speckners, intervened. Wilson and Farmers sought, and ultimately obtained, foreclosure of their liens.
A default judgment was éntered against…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- 79-83 Thirteenth Ave., Ltd. v. DeMarcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. WardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Betz v. Tower Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Otto-Johnson Mercantile Co. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- National Reserve Life Insurance v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Morgan Keegan Mortgage Co. v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Grygorwicz v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Speckner v. RieboldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- USLife Title Ins. Co. of Dallas v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.