Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Conley

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1929No. 3459PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

This is a motion to quash a writ of error directed to an order made upon supplementary proceedings. Code 1915, § 2214. See Hammond et al. v. District Court, 30 N. M. 137, 228 P. 758, 760, where the cited section is set forth in full.

Several grounds are assigned. We need mention but one. The writ of error was sued out within six months from, but more than twenty days after, the entry of the order. App. Proc. Rules II and IV. In this situation it is urged in favor of the motion that the order in question is a “final order affecting a substantial right made after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hammond v. 8th Jud. Dist. Ct., N.M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Llewellyn v. First State BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  3. New Mexico-Colorado Coal & Mining Co. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. BradyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Armijo v. PettitNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API