Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Allert

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1902PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cavalier County; Kneeshaw, J. Action by E. I. Donovan against H-. D. Allert and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

The plaintiff brings this action, and seeks to permanently enjoin the defendants from erecting telephone poles on the streets in front of his lots, situated in various blocks in the city of Langdon, N. D., and particularly described in the complaint, which is, in substance, as follows: That among other lots so described as being affected by the erection of such telephone poles, guy poles, cross bars and wires is the lot on which is erected the dwelling house in which plaintiff resides; that two poles have been erected in the street in front of said lot, and that the erection of said poles at…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Pierce v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. City of Denver v. BayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  4. Eels v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Otter Tail Power Co. v. Henry Von BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Johnson v. Wells County Water Resource BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. King v. Stark CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Small v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API