Legal Opinion
Shanafelt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 3, 1927No. A-5897PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on a charge of having the possession of in toxieating liquor and sentenced to pay fine of $500 and to serve a term of six months in the county jail.
Before entering upon the trial, a motion to suppress the evidence was presented and overruled, and objection to the admission of evidence as incompetent was properly made and overruled in the course of the trial. It is first argued that the affidavit, though positive in form, was in fact made on information and belief. This court has held that,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Hannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Cahill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Brandt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McCarthy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Stouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Jay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Clanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.