Legal Opinion

Brandt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 10, 1926No. A-5583PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

Appellant, G. F. Brandt, was convicted on an information charging that on November 19, 1924, he did have in his possession a compound mixture, com monly known as mash, and capable of being used for the distillation of intoxicating liquor, and in pursuance of the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and be confined in the county jail for 30 days. To reverse the judgment he appeals.

To understand the errors assigned it is necessary to refer to the evidence. It appears that A. W. Culp, deputy sheriff, and W. A. Spicer, city marshal of Yukon, under authority of a search warrant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Wiese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Crossman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stump v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Siverson v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Shanafelt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Gransbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API