Legal Opinion
Jay v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 9, 1929No. A-6396PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, P. J.
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having the possession of whisky with intent to sell. Defendant Joe Jay was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail, and each of the other defendants were sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 60 days in the county jail. i|
The record discloses that at the time charged certain deputy sheriffs and others with a search warrant went to the residence and premises of defendants, made a search, and in a field near the barn discovered a barrel…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Hannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Weber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Penney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Omalza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Buckley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Lowe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.