Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Cotton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Caddo County; J. T. Johnson, Judge. Action by Ruby Cotton against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEWART, C.
The defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought action against plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated as defendant, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff, caused by the negligent colliding of the train of defendant railroad company, upon which the plaintiff, her husband, Guy Cotton, and her two year old child were at the time riding as passengers, with another train of the defendant. The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that at the time of the collision she was pregnant, and that because of the injuries…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Herndon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Western Nat. Life Ins. v. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Smith v. TravelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kennedy v. RabySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Tyer v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Dovich v. Chief Consolidated Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
- Moore v. GrimesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.