Glassport Trust Co. v. Feightner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaefer,
This is an action brought by the payee of a promissory note against the maker. To the statement of claim filed, an affidavit of defense was interposed, which the court below held insufficient and entered judgment for plaintiff; defendant appeals.
We think a brief but embracing statement of the facts as they appear in the affidavit of defense will much simplify the solution of the problem submitted to us. Defendant avers that three men named Satterfield, trading under the name of Keystone Garage, by false and fraudulent statements and representations, obtained her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Andrews v. Blue Ridge Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Michelin Tire Co. v. SchulzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Superior National Bank v. StadelmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Johnston v. KnipeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Munhall v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Bucks Co. Trust Co. v. FellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Security Tr. Co. of Pottstown v. HubertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Huey v. Pfister, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1934
- Shaw v. Protane Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1932