Legal Opinion

Michelin Tire Co. v. Schulz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1928No. Appeals, 328 and 329PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Walling,

The Michelin Tire Company, a corporation located in New Jersey, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobile tires, while defendant, Otto E. Schulz, is a dealer in such tires at Philadelphia. Defendant bought quantities of tires from plaintiff, under sundry written agreements, during the years 1926 and 1927, and this suit is for a balance of $3,894.97 due thereon. Defendant admits the purchase, receipt and retention of the tires, but interposes a counterclaim of $5,873.80, on account of their alleged lack of durability. To this plaintiff filed a reply in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Andrews v. Blue Ridge Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. M'Farland v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  5. Griffin v. Metal Product Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. AM/PM Franchise Ass'n v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Harry Rubin & Sons, Inc. v. Consolidated Pipe Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Germantown T. Co. v. Emhardt (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API