Security Tr. Co. of Pottstown v. Hubert
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
This appeal involves the sufficiency of defendant’s pleadings in a suit upon a promissory note. The original statement of claim and affidavit of defense were superseded, and may be disregarded. The amended statement of claim was answered by an amended affidavit, and later by a “supplemental” affidavit of defense, complete in itself. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of de fense was argued before three of the judges of the court below and, in an able opinion by Soeeel, J., the affidavit was adjudged insufficient and a summary judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Dominion Trust Co. v. HildnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SunseriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Snellenburg Clothing Co. v. LevittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Riccardi Mot. Car Co. Inc. v. WeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935