Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. Kimball International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 12, 1984No. 84 C 3429Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”) has moved in this patent infringement action:
1. under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) to dismiss the second counterclaim (the “Counterclaim”) filed by Kim- ball International Company (“Kimball”), charging an antitrust violation under Sherman Act § 1 (15 U.S.C. § 1) and Clayton Act § 4 (15 U.S.C. § 15), and
2. under Rule 12(f) to strike Kimball’s affirmative defense of patent misuse (the “Affirmative Defense,” asserted in Ans. If 15).
For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, Motorola’s motion to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Robert WOLFOLK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Victor M. RIVERA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Beegle v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- La Salle Street Press, Inc. v. McCormick and Henderson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.