Legal Opinion

La Salle Street Press, Inc. v. McCormick and Henderson, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 9, 1971No. 18384_1PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT D. MORGAN, District Judge.

This appeal grows out of a suit for patent infringement. Both plaintiff and defendant are engaged in the business of commercial printing in the City of Chicago, Illinois. Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that it was the owner of Anderson Patent No. 3,136,248 (hereinafter referred to as the 248 Patent), entitled “Process and Apparatus for Temporarily Indicating Corrections in Text of Printed Matter,” and that defendant was infringing the process claims of that patent.

The 248 Patent issued June 9, 1964. Shortly thereafter plaintiff initiated a licensing program…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Brulotte v. Thys Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., in No. 75--1162 v. Carlisle Corporation, in No. 75--1163Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Rex Chainbelt Inc., (Cross-Appellee) v. Harco Products, Inc., Dba Dfc Company, (Cross-Appellant)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Decca Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API