Kay Jewelry Co. v. Board of Registration in Optometry
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This is a bill in equity of the class illustrated by Shuman v. Gilbert, 229 Mass. 225, and Slome v. Chief of Police of Fitchburg, 304 Mass. 187, brought by a dealer in eyeglasses, lenses and eyeglass frames, to restrain the enforcement against it of St. 1938, c. 434, on the ground *582that the statute is invalid and that its enforcement would destroy the plaintiff’s good will and established business.
The plaintiff for more than eight years has maintained an optical department for the sale of eyeglasses, lenses and eyeglass frames, and has employed to operate it registered optometrists, who have…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- The Pocket Veto CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Schwab v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Ritholz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Clark v. City Council of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Massachusetts Society of Optometrists v. WaddickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.