Legal Opinion

Schwab v. Ariyoshi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1977No. 6179PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

OGATA, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants, William Schwab and Richard “Ike” Sutton (hereinafter appellants), brought suit as taxpayers, in their own behalf and on behalf of other taxpayers similarly situated, in the First Circuit Court, against defendants-appellees (hereinafter appellees) being various state officers in the executive, judicial and legislative branches, in their individual capacities, seeking to halt the implementation of Parts II, III and IV of Act 58, S.L.H. 1975, on the grounds that it had been invalidly enacted in violation of the State Constitution and rules…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Abraham v. S. E. Onorato GaragesHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  5. United States v. Barney A. Gertz, Owner of 3,827 Coins Being Likenesses of the 1847 'Hapa Haneri' Issued by the Hawaiian GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Life of the Land v. LAND USE COM'N, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  2. New Jersey Association on Correction v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Bronster v. YoshinaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sierra Club v. Department of TransportationHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. Sun Na LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API