Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Burrell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The plaintiff assigns eleven errors in the instruction of the court to the jury. The plaintiff complains that the trial court ignored the allegations of an attractive nuisance and instructed the jury not to return a verdict for plaintiff, unless plaintiff proved an express invitation to enter on the premises.

The defendants contended that the plaintiff was a trespasser upon the premises, the care of which devolved upon the defendants, and they owed him no duty, except that of not inflicting any wanton or reckless injury. Citing and relying upon, among others, the cases of Riggle v. Lens, 71…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Archuleta v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Cooper v. North Coast Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Kennedy v. Independent Quarry & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. Carr v. Oregon-Washington R.R. Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API