Legal Opinion

Cooper v. North Coast Power Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The motion filed by defendants challenges the sufficiency of plaintiff's evidence to take the question of their alleged neglect to the jury. They further assert, in effect, that the evidence adduced by plaintiff establishes the negligence of the deceased boy in contributing to the injury sustained by him. Before a recovery can be…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Temple v. McComb City Electric Light & Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Mayfield Water & Light Co. v. Webb's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Sweeten v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Benton v. North Carolina Public-Service Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Turnidge v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sullivan v. Mountain States Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Burns v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Simmons v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Escobedo v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API