Carr v. Oregon-Washington R.R. Nav. Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.
Both parties have treated the law applicable to the foregoing facts as though this court has embraced that body of law frequently referred to by the name of turntable cases, the pioneer of which was Lynch v. Nurdin, 1 Q. B. 113 (Eng. Reprints, 1041), and which first received serious attention when the federal Supreme Court announced its decision in Sioux City P. R. Co. v. Stout, 17 Wall. 657 (21 L. Ed. 745). This court has many times dealt with groups of facts somewhat analogous to those embraced in the attractive nuisances cases but has never been compelled to squarely adopt or reject the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Fitzpatrick v. PenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Kelly v. BenasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- MacNeil v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Emery v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Hancock v. Aiken Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.