Legal Opinion

Matter of Long

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

This proceeding was initiated by an order directing the two respondents to show cause why an order of the Supreme Court should not issue requiring them, as attorneys and officers of the court, forthwith to return to the committee of an incompetent person the sum of $3,300.

At the outset it should be stated that, although all papers in the present proceeding bear the caption of an incompetency proceeding, we regard the proceeding here on appeal as summary in character. Although facts are repeatedly mentioned in the numerous affidavits of record which relate to the incompetency proceeding, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of Newbrand v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. In the Matter of EldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. New York Water Service Corp. v. Water Power & Control CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Bowling Green Savings Bank v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Matter of WeitlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. People v. OskrobaNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against GreerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Weatherly v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API