Legal Opinion
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Greer
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1963No. C. D. 4475PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
This is a disciplinary proceeding. Invoked are Canons of Professional Ethics 12 and 13, RCW Vol. 0, on fees, and Canon of Professional Ethics 29, RCW Vol 0, upholding the honor of the profession.
Respondent Harry D. Greer was admitted to practice in the courts of this state in 1955, and was a practicing attorney in Vancouver at the commencement of these proceedings. Acting as an attorney, he brought an action against one Horace F. Kiggins to collect a clothing store account, and reduced the same to judgment. Subsequent negotiations and an extension of time brought Mr. Kiggins to respondent’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Discipline of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Herrscher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Akers v. AkersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- In Re the Proceedings for the Discipline of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Matter of LongNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kam-Ko Bio-Pharm Trading Co. v. Mayne Pharma (USA) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against BoelterWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Annuity Board of Southern Baptist ConventionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against FraserWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re KutnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.