Legal Opinion

Falke v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1986No. S-605PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

We are asked in this appeal to consider the statutory requirements a candidate must meet to file for public office in Alaska and whether a Division of Elections policy properly implements those requirements. The trial court ruled that the name of a Fairbanks legislative candidate who had “substantially complied” with the statutory filing deadline should be placed on the 1984 primary ballot. Because we conclude that strict compliance is required, we reverse.

I

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. In 1984 the filing deadline for declaring candidacy for the state…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Painter v. ShanerTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hayes v. CharneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Grimm v. WagonerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. Anchorage Daily NewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. JefferyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Mullins v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API