Falke v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
We are asked in this appeal to consider the statutory requirements a candidate must meet to file for public office in Alaska and whether a Division of Elections policy properly implements those requirements. The trial court ruled that the name of a Fairbanks legislative candidate who had “substantially complied” with the statutory filing deadline should be placed on the 1984 primary ballot. Because we conclude that strict compliance is required, we reverse.
I
The pertinent facts are not in dispute. In 1984 the filing deadline for declaring candidacy for the state…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Painter v. ShanerTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Hayes v. CharneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Grimm v. WagonerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Municipality of Anchorage v. Anchorage Daily NewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JefferyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Mullins v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.