Legal Opinion
State v. Jeffery
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 2007No. S-12101PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The question presented here is whether two sitting Alaska judges complied with AS 15.85.070 and .110, which require judges seeking retention in office to file "declarations of candidacy for retention" with the Alaska Division of Elections "no later than August 1." The two judges filed their declaration of candidacy forms after the statutory filing deadline had passed. The Division of Elections determined that both judges were ineligible to stand for retention. The superi- or court ultimately concluded that the division had abused its discretion in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Storrs v. State Medical BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska v. John Does 1-6Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ByayukAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Butts v. BysiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Anderson v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- State, Department of Corrections v. HeiseyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.