Legal Opinion

Martin v. JAMES B. BERRY SONS'CO.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 23, 1936No. 3126PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves also three oth'er appeals from decrees of the federal District Court for Rhode Island dismissing the hills of complaint of the four plaintiffs; and by agreement of the parties the four appeals are to be determined on the record in the suit of Manuel Luiz Martin; the allegations and prayers being the same in each suit.

The defendant company, hereinafter referred to as the Berry Company, is a Pennsylvania corporation, but was registered and doing business in the state of Rhode Island, and had been engaged in constructing on its premises in Tiverton in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. National Tube Works Co. v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Smith v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Bucyrus Co. v. McArthurDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1914
  5. Steam Stone Cutter Co. v. JonesUnited States Circuit Court · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Retirement Board of the Employees' Retirement System v. CorrenteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  3. Ebsco Industries, Inc. v. Thomas E. Lilly, Third-Party-Plaintiff, J. Richard Egan Richard D. Egan and J. Edward Porter, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Ebsco Industries, Inc. v. Thomas E. Lilly, Third-Party-Plaintiff, J. Richard Egan Richard D. Egan and J. Edward Porter, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Naumovich v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API