Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ebsco Industries, Inc. v. Thomas E. Lilly, Third-Party-Plaintiff, J. Richard Egan Richard D. Egan and J. Edward Porter, III

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 23, 1988No. 86-3595Published

1DissentRyan, Circuit Judge

In my judgment, the district court was without authority to issue the preliminary injunction the court approves today. The authorities in support of that view are mar-shalled in a clear, coherent, and persuasive fashion in my brother’s opinion for the court. Unfortunately, the dispositive final paragraph for affirmance is antithetical to the discussion that proceeds it and, in my view, offers no basis in law to justify the court’s conclusion.

The issue, as correctly stated in the majority opinion, is “whether the district court may employ its injunctive powers under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 instead of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Usaco Coal Company v. Carbomin Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Thomas R. BRIMBERRY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Martin v. JAMES B. BERRY SONS'CO.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API