Legal Opinion

Naumovich v. Reese

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1952No. 14506Published

1Opinion

On Second Motion for Rehearing.

CRAMER, Justice.

Appellees have filed a strong motion for rehearing, attacking our opinion wherein we held that Reese and Bell have no accrued claim against Pera and Nickey Naumovich, reasserting that this case is controlled by our Supreme Court’s holding in the case of Colby v. McClendon, Tex.Civ.App., 116 S.W.2d 505. In Colby v. McClendon the background shows two final judgments, one by the Oklahoma court finally determining the rights of the parties in a judgment for a liquidated sum and by our Texas courts in a judgment based upon the Oklahoma final judgment.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phelps v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Dunham v. KauffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Colby v. McClendonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Dortic v. DugasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  5. Martin v. JAMES B. BERRY SONS'CO.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API