Legal Opinion

National Tube Works Co. v. Ballou

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 19, 1892No. 70PublishedCited by 64 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. This was a suit in equity, brought' in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, on November 1,1888, by the National Tube Works Company, a Massachusetts corporation, against George William Ballou, a citizen of New York.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. This was a suit in equity, brought' in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, on November 1,1888, by the National Tube Works Company, a Massachusetts corporation, against George William Ballou, a citizen of New York. The bill set forth that the Wiley Construction Company was a corporation organized in February, 1880, under the joint stock laws of Connecticut, and located in' Hartford, in that State: The bill was filed on behalf of the plaintiff and such other…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchfokd

' In his opinion in the' case, Judge Wallace states that he sustains the demurrer on the authority of his decisions in Claflin v. McDermott, 20 Blatchford, 522, 12 Fed. Rep. 375; and Walser v. Seligman, 21 Blatchford, 130, 13 Fed. Rep. 415; that he feels free to say that he doubts whether those cases did not adopt too technical a view of the right of a creditor, whose judgment has been obtained against his debtor at the place of the latter’s domicil, and whose execution has been issued there and returned unsatisfied, to maintain a creditor’s bill in a court of another State; and that he ihay…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Smith v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1820

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API