Alston v. Blythe
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
— The dispositive issue in this auto-pedestrian case is whether the trial court erred by giving an assumption-of-risk instruction. Holding that it did, we reverse and remand for new trial.
Portland Avenue is an arterial street in Tacoma. Near its intersection with East 29th Street, it has two northbound lanes, two southbound lanes, and a left-turn lane in the center.
On September 20, 1991, Alston started across Portland Avenue on foot.1 She was walking from east to west, at or near East 29th Street. It is agreed she was not in a marked crosswalk, but the parties contest whether she was in an…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Johnson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- McDowell v. GillieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Pudmaroff v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Pudmaroff v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Alston v. BlytheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.