Legal Opinion

Pudmaroff v. Allen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1999No. 66769-1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

977 P.2d 574 (1999)

138 Wash.2d 55

Richard PUDMAROFF, a single man, Respondent,

v.

Leona ALLEN and John Doe Allen, wife and husband, and the marital community composed thereof, Petitioners.

No. 66769-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued March 24, 1999.

Decided June 3, 1999.

Mark T. Fordham, David Shelton, Bricklin & Gendler, Michael W. Gendler, Seattle, amicus curiae on behalf of Bicycle Alliance of Washington.

Reed, McClure, William R. Hickman, Danielle A. Hess, Seattle, for Petitioners.

David R. Hallowell, Maltman, Reed, North, Ahrens & Malnati, Douglas Ahrens, Seattle, for Respondent.

TALMAD…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Wright v. EngumWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Mathis v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. In Re the Marriage of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Morse v. AntonellisWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Morse v. AntonellisWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Camicia v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Brutsche v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. RefuerzoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API