Legal Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. Gilbert
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 12, 1999No. Misc. (Subtitle AG) No. 67, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (the “Commission”), the petitioner, by Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709, filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action against Bruce Scott Gilbert, the respondent, alleging that he did engage in misconduct and charging violation of Rule 8.4(b) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct. 1 The Petition was referred, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-711(a), 2 to the Hon. James L. Ryan of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, for hearing and to make finding of fact and conclusions of law.
Following a hearing, the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. DechowitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MarcalusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.