Nast v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by:
KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
Roy and Billie Nast appeal the trial court’s judgment, arguing that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm Lloyds, and Daniel G. Clark. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the trial court.
Background
State Farm Agent Daniel G. Clark was the Nasts’ insurance agent for 18 years. 1 The Nasts’ home, cars, travel trailer, and four-wheelers were all insured by State Farm. In June of 1997, water rose in the area near the Nasts’ home and flooded a neighbor’s home. Concerned…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Michele M. Pitts v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company and Donald SchifferSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Aiken v. Hancock, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. American General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- ZIMMERHANZEL v. Green, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.