Legal Opinion
Aiken v. Hancock
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided July 16, 2003No. 04-01-00759-CVPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
PAUL W. GREEN, Justice.
This appeal arises from a deceptive trade practices, breach of fiduciary duty and equitable fee forfeiture case brought by Appellant Douglas Aiken against his former attorneys, Appellees Patrick Hancock and Mark Ferguson. On December 4, 2000, Aiken filed suit against Hancock and Ferguson, alleging several causes of action, including DTPA violations, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, negligence, and gross negligence. 1 Ferguson filed a motion for summary judgment which was partially granted by the trial court, dismissing Aiken’s breach of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Cosgrove v. GrimesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Duerr v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Murphy v. Gruber, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Trousdale v. Henry, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Floyd v. HefnerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Border Demolition & Environmental, Inc. v. Ernesto Pineda, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.