Legal Opinion

Big Land Investment Corp. v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1983No. 6154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

In 1971, Big Land Investment Corporation, the owner of the then partially completed Gold Rush Hotel in Anchorage, found itself in dire financial straits. It had incurred substantial construction debts and was unable to pay its creditors. According to Big Land’s general manager, David Grove, the only viable alternative was to sell the hotel, and the only available purchaser was Cox Enterprises, Inc. [“CEI”]. CEI was able to obtain short-term financing for $1,500,000 of the $1,750,000 purchase price from Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corporation [“L & N”], and Big Land…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. National Bank of Alaska v. J. B. L. & K. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bendix Corp. v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Middlebrook-Anderson Co. v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Cambridge Acceptance Corp. v. HocksteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Home Savings Ass'n v. State Bank of WoodstockDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  3. Provident Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Idaho Land Developers, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API