Provident Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Idaho Land Developers, Inc.
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
The dispute in this case surrounds the construction of terms in a concededly unambiguous subordination agreement. William and Mary Mockwitz appeal from the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Provident Federal Savings and Loan Association. The issues are whether Provident is entitled to judgment as a matter of law based upon the terms of the subordination agreement, and whether the district court abused its discretion in certifying the partial summary judgment as final under I.R.C.P. 54(b). For the reasons explained below, we affirm.
The Mockwitzes, together…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Engineering Co. v. Daum Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Pichon v. L. J. Broekemeier, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Snake River Equipment Co. v. ChristensenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Riggs National Bank of Washington v. WinesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Milbank Mutual Insurance v. Carrier Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Home Savings Ass'n v. State Bank of WoodstockDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Inversiones Inmobiliarias Internacionales De Orlando Sociedad Anomina v. BARNETT BANK OF CENTRALDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991