Legal Opinion

Bendix Corp. v. Adams

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1980No. 3960, 3966PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

The essential question in this case is whether the Bendix Corporation can be held liable for tortiously interfering with a contract between one of its former subsidiary companies, Marine Advisers, Inc. and James S. Adams, d/b/a Adams Barge Company. After trial by jury, Marine and Bendix were held jointly liable to Adams. In this appeal by Bendix, Marine’s liability is not disputed, nor is the validity of the contract between Marine and Adams. In a cross-appeal by Adams, Adams contends that Bendix can be found liable in contract if not liable in tort.

Our conclusion is that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Felsen v. Sol Cafe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Valores Corporativos, S.A. De C v. v. McLane Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  4. Knight v. American Guard & Alert, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Leavitt v. Leisure Sports IncorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API