Legal Opinion
Cambridge Acceptance Corp. v. Hockstein
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 19, 1968PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
102 N.J. Super. 435 (1968)
246 A.2d 138
CAMBRIDGE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
LEO HOCKSTEIN AND SYLVIA HOCKSTEIN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 20, 1968.
Decided August 19, 1968.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Herman J. Ziegler argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Robert Silver argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Martin Simon, attorney).
2Per curiam
We refer to the opinion filed in the Chancery Division for the essential facts and background of this litigation. Cambridge…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Joralmon v. McPheeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- Gill v. Mission Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Matthews v. HintonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Brooklyn Trust Co. v. Fairfield Gardens, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Cambridge Ac. Corp. v. AMERICAN NATL. MOT. INNSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- Tuscarora, Inc. v. B.V.A. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- First Connecticut Small Business Investment Co. v. Arba, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Fikes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Forest Inc. of Knoxville v. Guaranty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.