Legal Opinion

M. A. Sweeney Co. v. Fry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1898No. 18,330PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Prom the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee was plaintiff in the court below, and recovered judgment against appellants for $5,618.57, and for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by appellant Carroll on certain real estate in Clark county, Indiana. Appellants’ joint motion for a new trial was overruled, to which they excepted.

It is contended by appellants that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. The ground of this contention is, that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the finding of the court in favor of appellee. The note sued upon was for $10,000, executed by appellant M. A. Sweeney Company,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Childers v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Wood v. CallaghanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Earhart v. Farmers' CreameryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. National State Bank v. Sandford Fork & Tool Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bush v. McBrideIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Prescott v. HaugheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Indianapolis, Greenwood & Franklin Railroad v. HubbardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Shea v. Peoples Coal & Cement Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API