Wood v. Callaghan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Superior Court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant Callaghan brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion and summarized in the head-notes.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This cause was tried in the superior court of the city of Detroit, without a jury, and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs.
The facts, as found by J udge Chipman, so far as it is necessary to consider them to determine the questions raised in this Court, are substantially as follows:
The plaintiffs reside in Louisville, Kentucky, and are co-partners under the name of Alvin Wood & Co.
The defendant Callaghan resides in the city of Detroit, and has resided there since-the sixteenth day of June, 1884, at least. ■ On that day he sold a stock of groceries, and fixtures and furniture, in his store in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mathews v. SwitzlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Warren v. GilmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1840
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Shubert Theatrical Co. v. RathCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Snavely v. BoothSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Gustin v. Evening Press Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.