Legal Opinion

Prescott v. Haughey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1898No. 18,102PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

This action was instituted in October, 1893, and prosecuted in the lower court by appellants, "William B. Prescott and Abner G. Wines, to recover a money judgment against the defendants, appellees here, namely: Theodore *518P. Haugbey, Chas. F. Meyer, Robert B. F. Peirce, Harvey Satterwbite, and Schuyler Colfax, as the alleged directors of the Indianapolis National Bank, a banking institution organized under the laws of the United States, and situated, and doing business in the city of Indianapolis. This bank failed and closed its doors in July, 1893, and subsequently was placed in the hands of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Raymond v. WathenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Dorsey v. McGeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Kendel v. JudahIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. M. A. Sweeney Co. v. FryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Habich v. University Park Building Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hatfield v. RookerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Wines v. State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Hill v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Kealoha v. Halawa Plantation, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API