Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Greene County Clay Products Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1965No. Appeal, No. 118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

After a trial the jury awarded the plaintiff a verdict in a suit for breach of contract. The defendant filed motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial. The court below entered judgment n.o.v. in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from that judgment.

The plaintiff having been the verdict winner, the evidence, together with all reasonable inferences there*517from, must be considered in the light most favorable to him. Skoda v. West Penn Power Company, 411 Pa. 323. With that rule in mind we have reviewed the testimony and find the facts to have been as follows:

Plainti…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skoda v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Jordan v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. KoEune v. State Bank of Schuylkill HavenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Malone v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. AUSTIN v. HarnishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Olson v. North American Industrial Supply, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Kirkwood v. Andrews, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2010
  4. Montgomery v. GREENE CO. CLAY PROD. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API