AUSTIN v. Harnish
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
This is an appeal from the lower court’s refusal to grant plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial based on general allegations that the verdict was against the evidence, the weight of the evidence and the law. The main issue as we view it is whether or not the verdict was inadequate.
Plaintiffs’ car was struck from the rear by the car of defendant, Catherine HarMsh, while both vehicles were in a line of heavy traffic that had stopped for a red light. Plaintiff, John Begley, was the driver and plaintiff, Ronald Austin, was the passenger and also the owner of the car that was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- ALEXANDER v. KnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Todd v. BerciniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Paustenbaugh v. Ward Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Greenwood v. KadoichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Morin v. BrassingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Bronchak v. RebmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Frisk v. News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Corson v. Corson's, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.