Legal Opinion

KoEune v. State Bank of Schuylkill Haven

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1938No. Appeal, 303PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldeige, J.,

The plaintiffs, licensed as public fire insurance adjusters, brought suit against the defendant banks upon a written contract, as modified by parol, to recover the sum of $850 for services rendered to the State Bank of Schuylkill Haven, hereinafter called State Bank, one of the defendants, for adjusting a fire loss to its building. The trial resulted in a directed verdict for defendants. Plaintiffs appealed from the entry on the verdict.

The following facts were admitted in the pleadings offered in evidence by the plaintiffs:

On March 8,1932, the State Bank sustained a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Henes v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Knight v. Gulf Refining CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. York Metal & Alloys Co. v. Cyclops Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Russell v. SicklesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Loeffler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nicolella v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Ragnar Benson, Inc. v. Bethel Mart AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Empire Properties, Inc. v. Equireal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Quarture Et Ux. v. Allegheny Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Culbreth v. Lawrence J. Miller, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API