Legal Opinion

Hostetler v. Kniseley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1936No. Appeal, 80PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

This appeal presents the usual right-angle collision at a public crossing with motions for judgment n. o. v. and a new trial. The evidence as it relates to the legal questions involved will be reviewed in the course of the opinion.

Under the Act of April 22, 1905, P. L. 286, the court cannot enter judgment n. o. v. where the evidence is conflicting on a material fact, or where any other reason exists precluding a binding direction: Dalmas v. Kemble, 215 Pa. 410; Schwarz v. Glenn, 244 Pa. 519, 524. The court does not determine questions of fact based upon…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Morin v. KreidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Mix v. North American Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Hegarty v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Bloomsburg Mills, Inc. v. Sordoni Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Gregg v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API