Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Anthony Badolato, Dean Quarnstrom, and Richard Vaughn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 1, 1983No. 81-7692PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Richard Badolato, Richard Vaughn, and Dean Quarnstrom were found guilty of conspiring to import and possess marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, 952(a), 963. Vaughn and Quarnstrom also were found guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 1952, 2, relating to Interstate Transportation in Aid of Racketeering, and Vaughn was found to have violated 21 U.S.C. § 843(b)’s prohibition against Use of Communication to Facilitate Possession. The three men were tried together in district court, and each has appealed. Upon review, we affirm each'conviction.
I
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Faircloth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- United States v. BascaroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Wendell Cole, Howard Masters, B.K. Taylor, Larry Masters, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Constance Haas Meester, Jeanne Sanfratello Tumulty, Robert Haas, Edward Conrad SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Hernan Francisco Perez-Tosta, Gustavo Javier Correa-Patino, Erasmo Perez-Aguilera, Luis Guillermo Rojas-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.