Legal Opinion
United States v. Hernan Francisco Perez-Tosta, Gustavo Javier Correa-Patino, Erasmo Perez-Aguilera, Luis Guillermo Rojas-Valdez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 8, 1994No. 92-4781PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COX, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Hernán Perez^-Tosta (Tosta), Gustavo Correa-Patino (Correa), Erasmo Perez-Aguilera (Aguilera), and Luis Rojas-Valdez (Rojas) appeal convictions for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and, in Rojas’s and Correa’s cases, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Because the prosecutor gave only a few minutes’ pretrial notice, Aguilera challenges the district court’s admission of prior bad acts evidence under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b). In addition, Aguilera, Tosta, and Rojas contend that the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MantonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SchleiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.