Legal Opinion

Hines v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Tbe appeal presents tbe question whether tbe commissioner’s deed conveys a good title to the purchaser.

It was formerly provided by statute that tbe land of a minor should in no case be liable to sale for taxes, but that bis guardian should pay tbe tax when due; also that in'case of tbe guardian’s default tbe tax list in tbe hands of tbe sheriff should be an execution to be satisfied out of his individual property or out of tbe personal property of bis ward. Laws 1872-73, cb. 115, see. 28(4); Laws 1876-77, cb. 155, sec. 29; The Code, sec. 3691. In 1887 the General Assembly modified the law by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matthews v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Glisson v. . GlissonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. HerringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Rawls v. . HenriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guy v. . HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Travis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. First National Bank of Durham v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Hill v. . StreetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Forsyth County v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API