First National Bank of Durham v. Thomas
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlaeksoN, J.
Tbe question of law involved: Did the court below err in overruling defendants’ I. W. "Woolley and wife, Ellie Woolley’s demurrer ore tenus to the plaintiffs’ complaint? We think so.
C. S., 446, in part, is as follows: “Every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except as otherwise provided,” etc.
C. S., 511: “The defendant may demur to the complaint when it appears upon the face thereof, either that: . . . (2) The plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue. . . . (4) There is a defect of parties plaintiff or defendant.”
In Fishell v. Evans, 193 N. C., 660, 662, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jones v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Gammon v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Martin v. . Mask.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Monday v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Hines v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Lockridge v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Beaufort County v. . MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Kemp v. . FunderburkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Riddick v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.