Legal Opinion

Forsyth County v. . Joyce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The defendants raise the question whether under existing laws the land of a minor is exempt from sale during his minority for the nonpayment of taxes. The question calls for reference to the historical background of the several statutes relating to the subject.

As early as 1873 the General Assembly declared that- the land of a minor should in no case be liable to be sold for taxes. Public Laws, 1872-’73, chap. 115, sec. 28(4). The substance of this statute appears in The Code (1883), see. 3691; in the Revisal of 1905, sec. 2861; and in the Consolidated Statutes (1919), sec. 7984.

In 1885 the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keith v. . LockhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Southern Assembly v. . PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Orange County v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. McMillan v. Hogan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Headman v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Travis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Hill v. . StreetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Headman v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API