Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. Alexander
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The infant defendants through their guardian ad litem appealed from the judgment, assigning for error the matters to which their four exceptions relate. The first and fourth exceptions may be considered together. -
1. Not only was the action properly constituted in the Superior Court, but the court in the exercise of its equitable powers had jurisdiction to advise and instruct the trustee as to its discharge of the duties imposed upon it by the trust. One of the most important subjects of equitable jurisdiction is that of trusts, for the interest of all parties can be protected only by a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Springs v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Morris v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Tate v. . MottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Alsbrook v. . ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. HerringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Reynolds Ex Rel. Cannon v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Bohannon v. TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Bohannon v. . TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.